HOME

skip to main content
About Jane About JASA JASA News
Sensibilities Calendar Conference
Book Reviews Library Writing Competition
Mrs Goddard's Regency Fair Links

The Jane Austen Society of Australia

<< Back to Sensibilities: Index of articles

Back issues

These extracts are from JASA's twice-yearly journal (June & December), Sensibilities, which, like all JASA publications, is sent free to JASA members.

Hard copies of the current issue are available only to JASA members.

Most past issues of Sensibilities can be purchased for A$6.00 each.
See the Sensibilities list of articles.

Extracts from Sensibilities
December 2005

Volume 31: December 2005

Papers from the JASA Conference July 2005

Talks and Submissions

Book Reviews

  • Jane Austen Mansfield Park: A Reader’s Guide to essential criticism.
    by Sandie Byrne, reviewed by Kerry James 
  • The Watsons by Jane Austen
    completed by Merryn Williams, reviewed by Judy Stove

LINK: Top of page
________________________________

 

Jane Austen’s Men: St George and the Dandy in Jane Austen’s Emma

Joseph A. Kestner is McFarlin Professor of English and Director of Film Studies at the University of Tulsa. He is also the author of Masculinities in Victorian Painting (1995), Sherlock’s Men: Masculinity, Conan Doyle and Cultural History (1997), The Edwardian Detective (2000), and Sherlock’s Sisters: The Bristish Female Detective 1864-1913 (2003). He has lectured widely on 19th century British literature and art in Great Britain, Australia, Canada and the USA.

On 29 September 1914, there appeared in The Evening News one of the most momentous documents relating to the legend of St George, the patron saint of England. This was Arthur Machen’s brief tale ‘The Bowmen’, recounting how St George brought ‘the ancient archers of Agincourt to the rescue of a modern British army during the retreat before the Germans at Mons …a few days after the battle’ (xiii). As one critic notes: ‘It immediately created a sensation, for people who were at the beginning of a war that was then going against them were eager for a miracle. They seized upon Machen’s invented tale and insisted that it was true’...

At the same time, another cultural force was at work, described by Elaine Showalter discussing the late 19th century. She stated that the period was marked by a ‘crisis of masculinity’ in society:

Gender crisis affected men as well as women, and the fantasies of a pitched battle for sexual supremacy typical of the period often concealed deeper uncertainties and contradictions on both sides. It is important to keep in mind that masculinity is no more natural, transparent, and unproblematic than ‘femininity’. It, too, is a socially constructed role, defined within particular cultural and historical circumstances. Many men found their part of the equation as difficult to sustain as women did theirs, and the source of much anxiety. Where, men asked themselves, were they placed on the scale of masculinity? (8-9).

... and to read more, join JASA and receive your twice-yearly copy of Sensibilities free.

LINK: Top of page
________________________________

 

 

 

The Men in the Background

Pamela Whalan has given several papers at JASNA Conferences, and has spoken to JASA meetings on such subjects as Sex Appeal & Solid Worth (1996), and They Also Serve who only Stand and Wait (2002). She has directed successful seasons of four stage adaptations of Austen novels - Pride and Prejudice, Emma, Mansfield Park and Sense and Sensibility at the Genesian Theatre, and is currently directing another of her own works The Dancing Princesses in Newcastle.

Every student of acting knows a version of the story about the drama competition in which the prize for best actor went to the ‘third spear-carrier from the left’. It is the story that reinforces the belief that there is no such thing as a small role because the audience’s willing suspension of disbelief relies on the total picture. No matter how brilliant the leading actor may be, if in the middle of his most important speech, the spear-carrier sneezes or shuffles or waves to Aunty Maude, the audience will not be able to maintain its focus. The same is true of the minor characters in a novel. If they do not go about their business naturally and unobtrusively how can the author hope to convince the reader of the authenticity of the world he is creating? This paper is dedicated to the spear-carriers in the Austen novels – those characters who never appear except perhaps to open a door or be present at a party; who live at a distance and are spoken of but never seen; who are neighbours or relations or friends; members of the larger community who help the world of the novel to function but who never have a line of dialogue. So let us look at the way in which Austen uses the literary device of the man in the background to enrich her work...

... and to read more, join JASA and receive your twice-yearly copy of Sensibilities free.

LINK: Top of page
________________________________

 

Who Is Henry Tilney and Why Do We Love Him?

Harriet Veitch trained as a journalist and is now a sub-editor and book reviewer with the Sydney Morning Herald. She is also an amateur Austenite. Her hobbies include Henry Tilney and Fitzwilliam Darcy. She would rather not meet the Bingley sisters or Fanny Dashwood.

Henry Tilney is a young clergyman, from a good family in Gloucestershire. He is

four or five and twenty, rather tall, with a pleasing countenance, a very intelligent and lively eye, and, if not quite handsome, very near it. His address is good. (p.25)

Catherine describes him to Isabella as having ‘a brown skin, with dark eyes, and rather dark hair.’ (p.43) He is a younger son, but unusually for the breed, is well off. General Tilney says Henry is ‘of a very considerable fortune’ with an income of ‘independence and comfort’ from marriage settlements, which we assume are from his rich mother. As well as this he has the family living of Woodston, which General Tilney says just by itself would keep him comfortable.

We don’t get the actual cash details, but it is clear that even though Henry isn’t the heir to Northanger Abbey, he has enough money to live well, and, importantly, be independent of his controlling father.

So why do we love Henry Tilney?...

... and to read more, join JASA and receive your twice-yearly copy of Sensibilities free.

LINK: Top of page
________________________________

 

Introducing Mr Woodhouse 

Susannah Fullerton is president of JASA, and freelance speaker on literature to a wide range of organisations, both within and outside the Jane Austen community. She is the author of Jane Austen and Crime (JASA, 2004), and co-editor of Jane Austen: Antipodean Views (Wellington Lane, 2001).She leads an annual tour around her favourite literary sites in England, Ireland and Scotland, and is a judge for the annual Westfield Waverley Library Award for Literature.

Many years ago Professor Joe Wiesenfarth came to talk about ‘Civility in Emma’ at one of our conferences. He was discussing Mr Woodhouse and when asked how on earth Mr Woodhouse had managed to father two children, Joe replied that if JASA invited him to come and speak again, he would tell us. We did invite Joe back to Australia and, inevitably, a member of the audience reminded him that he had promised to tell us how Mr Woodhouse had ever managed to procreate. There was a long silence. Then Joe replied, ‘Haven’t you heard of Viagra?’ I think it took at least ten minutes before the audience recovered enough for the conference to continue.

It was, of course, Jane Austen’s intention that we should laugh over Mr Woodhouse. He is one of her greatest comic creations.

We meet Mr Woodhouse in the first chapter of Emma. Miss Taylor has married and Emma and her father sit forlornly at Hartfield. Emma, we are told,

was now in great danger of suffering from intellectual solitude. She dearly loved her father, but he was no companion for her. He could not meet her in conversation, rational or playful.1

We are then informed that the

evil of the actual disparity in their ages (and Mr Woodhouse had not married early) was much increased by his constitution and habits; for having been a valetudinarian all his life, without activity of mind or body, he was a much older man in ways than in years; and though everywhere beloved for the friendliness of his heart and his amiable temper, his talents could not have recommended him at any time.2

There is an interesting contradiction within these lines. Mr Woodhouse is ‘everywhere beloved’, and yet has nothing whatever to recommend him...

... and to read more, join JASA and receive your twice-yearly copy of Sensibilities free.

LINK: Top of page
________________________________

 

In Defence of Colonel Brandon

Robyn Williams has taught English to local and overseas students, has directed public performances of over 20 school plays and is a member of the Genesian Theatre and the Pymble Players. She has composed several play scripts and character sketches for JASA Study Days, and in 2005 spoke to our Society on Ann Radcliffe as a source for Jane Austen.

At the conclusion of Sense and Sensibility Marianne Dashwood who, as Austen tells us, was ‘born to an extraordinary fate’ (S&S p.321), marries Colonel Brandon. She is 19. He is on the wrong side of five and thirty (ibid p.30), old enough to be her father, and, worst of all, he still seeks the ‘constitutional safeguard of a flannel waistcoat’ (ibid p.321). There have always been readers who have found the ending disappointing – rather a letdown for Marianne Dashwood. Surely she could have done better. Surely Jane Austen could have given her someone younger, more dashing, and more charismatic than this respectable but sombre man, whom she weds out of friendship and esteem rather than passion. However Austen clearly knew what message she wished to convey about the nature of a happy marriage based on lasting love...

... and to read more, join JASA and receive your twice-yearly copy of Sensibilities free.

LINK: Top of page
________________________________

 

Work-tables and Work-boxes in Georgian England

Marlene Arditto has collected needlework tools and accessories for 30 years and is a member of the Needlework Tools Collectors Society of Australia. Her paper allowed an amalgam of two passions – Jane Austen and the Regency period and researching the social context in which needlework items were used. An earlier paper delivered at the Leura Conference in 1998 was entitled Female Work and Work Tools in Jane Austen’s World.

In pondering her moral dilemma regarding the proposed home theatricals at Mansfield Park, Fanny Price worried that ‘the table between the windows was covered with work-boxes and netting-boxes, which had been given to her at different times, principally by Tom; and she grew bewildered as to the amount of the debt which all these kind remembrances produced’.1

This scene prompted me to enquire: What sort of work-boxes did Fanny own? What was her work-table like? Answers to these questions form the basis of this paper on work-boxes and work-tables in Georgian England. Although the Georgian period lasted from 1714 to 1830, we ignore the first 60 years, as work-tables were unknown before 1770 and work-boxes before 1790...

... and to read more, join JASA and receive your twice-yearly copy of Sensibilities free.

LINK: Top of page
________________________________

 

Jane Austen’s Lifelong Health Problems and Final Illness

Annette Upfal is a law graduate and teacher whose special area of interest is biographical research on Jane Austen. Her PhD project at the University of Queensland explores the relationship between Jane's experience of illness in her own life and depictions of illness in her writings.

New analysis points to a fatal Hodgkin’s disease and excludes the widely accepted Addison’s 
Adapted from an article in the Journal of Medical Humanities No. 31, 2005.

The spectre of disease and early death hung over Jane Austen in the final two years of her life, as she continued to work on her novels, whilst her body weakened and wasted and ultimately failed her at the age of 41. The nature of her illness had baffled her medical advisors, and still remains a subject of controversy. Current medical opinion, biographers and encyclopaedic reference [following Zachary Cope, ‘Jane Austen’s Last Illness.’ Reprinted from BMJ July 1964. In: Jane Austen Society Collected Reports (1949-65): v.1. Alton, 267-72] all lean towards a diagnosis of Addison’s disease, which involves destruction of the adrenal glands, but other medical opinion surmises that Jane may have been suffering from Hodgkin’s disease, a form of cancer. Both diseases were unidentified and untreatable in Austen’s lifetime, and the outcome was always fatal...

... and to read more, join JASA and receive your twice-yearly copy of Sensibilities free.

 

FEEDBACK: info@jasa.net.au

13 January 2007

HOME | What's New | About Jane | About JASA | JASA News | Sensibilities | Calendar | Conference | Book ReviewsJASA Library | Writing Competition | Mrs Goddard's School | Regency Fair | LINKS