LINK: Home LINK: About Jane AustenLINK: About JASALINK: JASA News
jasens2.gif (579 bytes)LINK: JASA CalendarLINK: Annual Conference
LINK: Book ReviewsLINK: JASA LibraryLINK: Writing Comp
LINK: Mrs Goddard's SchoolLINK: Regency FairLINK: Other JA Sites

everbody reads JASA news

Back to
JASA News Index

Search tips
Advanced Search

 

 

Jane Austen Society of Australia

JASA News
December 2000

Feature
How much fun can one person have at a JASA Annual Conference?

wonderlady.gif (8439 bytes)

LINK: Top of page
________________________________ 

 

 

Chawton Under Threat

Members will be shocked to hear of the proposed major development in Jane’s lovely village of Chawton.

We learnt of this from Jean Bowden, Archivist of the JA House Museum there. (See her Letter from Chawton.)

The construction of ‘three large terraced houses’ immediately opposite the Jane Austen House would indeed change the entire ambience of this charming Hampshire village, altering the aspect from Jane’s house beyond recognition.

Winter in Chawton. The view opposite Jane Austen House

Winter in Chawton: looking along the side of Jane Austen House, through the front street entrance to the rolling, wooded hills opposite the house, as Jane would have seen them. The proposed development on the site where you can see the cars parked would block this view forever. Picture courtesy Jane Austen House Museum

As a Society, we have certainly added our voices of dissent to the project, as have over 150 of our concerned members. We are appalled that such a project should be considered, with the whole site actually being within the Chawton Village Conservation area, one of the earliest to be designated in Hampshire, the purpose of which is specifically to retain the aspect and appearance of the village which has survived almost unchanged since Jane Austen’s day. These proposed houses would completely block the view of the hill, woods and fields from the House – the view that Jane Austen knew and loved – and would also destroy the whole ‘country village’ ambience.

Historically there has never been any building on this site, and the proposed development would completely and irreversibly change the environment in the very centre of this historic village, creating a major new building mass of full height where none had previously existed, dominating the centre of the village where, apart from Jane Austen’s House of 1690, there are also Pond Cottages built in the 1300s, and several of the 1500s too. Such a development would have a lasting adverse effect on what is a uniquely well-preserved example of a classic English village which is also of great importance to England’s literary and cultural heritage.

The developers say the buildings will be of ‘Regency’ style – faux ‘regency’, in Jane Austen’s village!!!

This important historical village is currently being much supported by the appropriate and well-researched renovation (not redevelopment) of the ‘Great House’ of the village, Chawton House, and its library and research centre for early women writers. Their sympathetic renovations are a model for what can be done in such a village. The village should be retained, we believe, in its present most pleasant state.

Though the date for objections to the proposal has passed (30 November), we urge members still to write their views to the Council, at the address below, or to sign (and/or add a comment) to the appropriate place on the order form attached to this Newsletter, when you return your subscription or order.

The thought of a visit to a Chawton overshadowed and hemmed in by a heavy mass of new, unsympathetic construction should be enough to send every member rushing for their pens.

Letters, not emails or faxes, should be
sent, quoting Planning Application
F. 25056/004 FUL, to:

Mr Keith Oliver,
East Hampshire District Council,
Penns Place, Petersfield, Hampshire
GU31 4EX, England

LINK: Top of page
________________________________ 

 

JASA President, Susannah Fullerton

Susannah Fullerton
President
JASA

Letter from the President

In this year of the Olympic Games, it seems to me appropriate that JASA should have its share of the medals. I therefore have great pleasure in awarding the following:

Gold Medal

To all those who donated so happily and generously so that JASA could purchase a computer and maintain the high standard of publications that all members have come to expect. Your donations were the most wonderful vote of confidence in the Society and your performance was greatly appreciated by the committee and editor.

Silver Medal

To all our speakers this year, who volunteered their time and expertise so that we could all increase our understanding, and therefore our enjoyment, of Jane Austen’s works and world.

Maggie Lane and Douglas Murray, having made marathon efforts to get to Australia, then delivered papers which made our weekend conference an especially memorable occasion. Amanda Jones tackled a subject of olympian difficulty and delighted us with her talk on Jane Austen and Sport. Pamela Whalan and Nora Walker, like true athletes, aimed for ‘perfection’ in their team act, while John Wiltshire challenged us with the subject of Pride and Prejudice for a contemporary audience. Professor Angus Martin highlighted the difference in international styles and had us all in fits of laughter over what the French did to Sense and Sensibility. Kim Hicks bravely did a solo performance, taking ‘Courtship’ to the JASA podium and enthralling us all. Our speakers left us marvelling at the power, flexibility, strength, grace and endurance of our favourite novelist.

Bronze Medal

To the committee of JASA, for yet another year of hard work, inspiration, dedication and staying power. You manage to leap all the hurdles, last the distance in arranging conferences, balance the finances beautifully on the beam between spending and saving, maintain the pace during marathon committee meetings and keep smiling through it all. You are, quite simply, ‘the best ever’!!!

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to all JASA
members.

Susannah Fullerton

LINK: Top of page
________________________________

Current JASA Publications

The June 2000 issues of JASA publications Sensibilities and the JASA Newsletter, have been sent to all JASA members

You can read short extracts of each of the Sensibilities articles online. The articles in this latest issue of Sensibilities are: 

  • The Last Will & Testament of Theophilus Leigh of Adlestrop
    Full Transcript, Introduced and Transcribed with select Family Tree - Dr Jon Spence    

  • Jane Austen & Sport - Amanda Jones

  • James Stanier Clarke & Jane Austen - Richard Wheeler

plus the JASA 2000 Conference Papers:

  • Welcome to the JASA Conference - Susannah Fullerton

  • In Search of 'Elegance' - Yvette Field

  • Eating & Entertaining with Elegance - Maggie Lane

  • 'Not so refined as she ought to have been'? - Douglas Murray  

  • The Spectacles of Life - Douglas Murray

  • Bath: the Epitome of Elegance - Maggie Lane

Items from the Newsletter (and from Practicalities, JASA's news update sheet published in March and September) are reproduced on this website. 

Most past issues of Sensibilities can be purchased for A$6.00 each. See the Sensibilities list of articles.

For another taste of what members enjoy in Sensibilities, the JASA refereed journal praised for its consistently high literary standards, read a longer extract from a talk by Penny Gay to a JASA meeting in 1994, as reported in a previous Sensibilities: 'Emma and the Battle of Waterloo'.

LINK: Top of page
________________________________

     

The pursuit of elegance

The Pursuit of Elegance
JASA’s Annual Conference, ‘Jane Austen & Elegance’,
Leura, July 2000

Full texts of the conference papers are available in JASA's journal. Sensibilities, distributed free to JASA members. (Extracts of these papers can be read online.)

So we went to the Blue Mountains, acolytes in search of Jane Austen and Elegance. Of course, we already had elegance of mind, we are members of the Jane Austen Society. We were elegant of mind and sometimes body, we had elegant intentions – even the landscape was elegant, in a wintery way.

So, what did we find, chasing Elegance in a Cold Climate? (Aside from some remnant snow, which the staff tried to kid us was hoar frost. Pshaw!)

We found the committee poised and ready for us, organised down to the little bar of chocolate in every Conference folder. Our Fearless Leader Susannah Fullerton waited, welcoming, smiling, and, incidentally, ready to pounce on any idea that might be turned into a paper. We heard, ‘That’s a good idea for a paper, we always need ideas. Would you write it?’ many times over the weekend. (Generally, it must be said, followed by an awkward silence and the sound of people looking at their watches.)

[Memo Susannah (whose surname is the name of Catherine Morland’s home village, as you know), paper idea: Carrying a Jane Name – Elegance or Austen-tation?]

We found like-minded people, such a comfort these days when so many outsiders cannot understand reading Jane Austen without a curriculum to force them. But then they’re the sort of people who think a Jane Austen Society must be made up of little old ladies sitting in a circle, sipping tea and saying, ‘Oh, isn’t Miss Austen a lovely writer!’.

We found people who had read the same books we had, especially the Anne of Green Gables series, Barbara Pym, and, funnily enough, the Harry Potter books.

We found wonderful speakers, warm rooms and a great deal of food. We found Marlene Arditto’s table display of Most Precious Treasures: an Indian shawl, hand-made scissors, thimbles and early silver tea caddy spoons. We found the tale of one committee member’s schoolgirl plumbing raids.

The Conference started with Susannah and committee member Anne Harbers with a microphone and a series of questions for the two overseas speakers, Maggie Lane and Douglas Murray, letting the speakers show themselves as something other than talking heads.

Douglas Murray first read Jane Austen when he was 12, simply because she was on his reading list and he was a swot (unlike Emma and her reading lists, as he pointed out). He didn’t see the humour in Austen then, but he got better and is now a professor in the Department of Literature and Language at Belmont University in Nashville. He and Margaret Anne Doody edited Catharine and other Writings for Oxford World’s Classics.

Currently working on A Passion for Taking Likenesses: The Visual Culture of Jane Austen, his mission in life is to persuade people that there is more to Nashville Tennessee than country music.

Maggie Lane has amused herself through life by writing Jane Austen’s World, Jane Austen and Food, A Charming Place: Jane Austen and Bath, The Jane Austen Quiz and Puzzle Book, Jane Austen’s Family and Jane Austen’s England. Also, for the millennium, helping to compile Jane Austen: A Celebration (now available through our Regency Fair), a collection of what other people think or have thought about Jane Austen.

Maggie’s writing began almost by accident. She was waiting for someone to gather all the information together and write a book about the generations of the Austen family. After a while she gave up waiting and did it herself, and hasn’t stopped since.

Of course, it had to be asked if there were writers the speakers preferred, but what could they have said? A simple ‘John Grisham’ would have killed them forever.

Next morning we started the serious work, we were going to learn elegance – some red noses, bulky jumpers and woolly hats (but the occasional elegant shawl) notwithstanding.

[Another Memo to Susannah, paper idea: Gathering in Jane’s Name: Symbiosis and JASA.]

But horror! What have we here, a paper by Yvette Field, In Search Of Elegance. How promising you might think, but no, a rat in the ranks! Yvette’s presentation was a close study of the use of the word in the novels, and she had slipped into our folders an innocuous looking couple of pages called ‘Instances of the words "elegance", "elegancies" and "elegantly" in the novels from Lady Susan to Persuasion extracted from A Concordance to the Works of Jane Austen’. Although the words are often used simply, all too often we find them used much more ironically than one would suppose until they are gathered together like this. Could it be that elegance is not devoutly to be desired?

Mr Collins’ ‘elegant compliments’, Mrs Elton ‘as elegant as lace and pearls could make her’, ‘Jane Fairfax was very elegant, remarkably elegant’, Persuasion’s ‘elegant little clock’ in a rigid unfeeling room. It’s very hard to find one’s longed-for elegance allied with cold-hearted, over-refined and idiotic people.

A respite with Maggie Lane: Eating and Entertaining with Elegance, so much more the thing.

But then, another nasty blow… ‘Not so refined as she ought to have been’: Was Jane Austen Elegant? with Douglas Murray. Well, you’d think that was what the Americans call a ‘no-brainer’, wouldn’t you? Of course she was elegant, you’d lick anyone who said otherwise, wouldn’t you? Well, Fanny is the woman to aim your blows at, Jane’s own beloved niece, ungrateful, overstarched Victorian wretch that she turned out to be in later years.

After the shock of this, a much gentler afternoon with Alan Landis and all the charm of the unstoppable enthusiast. Alan is a Wedgwood expert and brought slides and actual Wedgwood china to show what Jane Austen would have seen in her time. But more trouble, dark mention was made of the Wedgwood Museum’s recalcitrance in providing the pattern of the china the Rev George Austen ordered. Douglas Murray suggests a boycott.

A little lie down before dinner, to stop the head spinning.

For dinner, some guests dressed Georgian. Shame on the rest of you who thought a smart suit would do just as well.

Poetry to follow dinner, read by Pat Shepherd. A little Austen, a little Byron, a little Cowper, just the ticket for a nice night’s entertainment.

Sunday and more Jane Austen, gluttons (of one sort and another) that we are.

Douglas’s talk Jane Austen and the Spectacles of Life, was an excellent follow-on to John Wiltshire’s AGM talk in February: Reading Pride And Prejudice Now, with his thoughts on how Elizabeth Bennet saw Darcy, and how that seeing changed as she grew up. But can elegance be accompanied by so much deep thought and theorising?

This conferencing is hard work, it’s not elegantly reclining on sofas, eating sweetmeats and looking at pretty slides as we had imagined. Could Jane Austen really have meant all these secondary plots, subterranean shadings, Renaissance reflections and Age of Reason philosophies? What about those of us who have just been reading her for pleasure, what sort of fools are we?

[Memo Susannah, third paper idea: I Didn’t Realise This Was Serious! Reflections on Finding out Too Much about Jane Austen’s Writings]

Then Maggie Lane’s Bath: The Epitome of Elegance. At last, elegance we can understand and love, thank you, thank you, thank you Maggie.

Then to finish the weekend, the answers to the Conference quiz, with only a few fights about exact wordings. Elegance is one thing, losing the quiz on a technicality is quite another, could this get ugly? (No, of course not.)

The quiz was won by two people up from Melbourne, which suggests that down there they have nothing better to do than read Jane Austen. But after all, what else better could there be for any of us to do?

Harriet Veitch

LINK: Top of page
________________________________

 

 

Wegdwood medallion

Wedgwood’s fame and work spread widely. This is an idealised allegory of the infant (Australian) colony. Hope Encouraging Art and Labour, under the influence of Peace, a medal made from the clay of Sydney Cove by Josiah Wedgwood. Picture: Mitchell Library & Dixson collections, Sydney, reprinted in Robert Hughes’ The Fatal Shore, Collins 1987.

The Elegance of Wedgwood

Fashion is infinitely superior to merit in many respects, Josiah Wedgwood (1730-1795) told his erstwhile business partner Thomas Bentley in 1779. This judgment was, of course, a purely commercial view and, in this sense, it remains substantially accurate to this day. Fashion has always played an important part in the marketing of pottery and porcelain, and has therefore been a major influence on design. Meissen had been the pre-eminent European porcelain factory, giving place to Sevres as the supreme leader of rococo porcelain, which in turn yielded the lead to Wedgwood as the master potter of the neo-classical style.

Jane Austen demonstrated her knowledge of these changes in this passage from Northanger Abbey:

The elegance of the breakfast-set forced itself on Catherine’s notice when they were seated at table; and, luckily, it had been the General’s choice. He was enchanted by her approbation of his taste, confessed it to be neat and simple, thought it right to encourage the manufacture of his country; and for his part, to his uncritical palate, the tea was as well flavoured from the clay of Staffordshire[Wedgwood] as from that of Dresden [Meissen] or Sévres. But this was quite an old set, purchased two years ago. The manufacture was much improved since that time: he had seen some beautiful specimens when last in town, and had he not been perfectly without vanity of that kind might have been tempted to order a new set.

While porcelain remained costly and its purchase represented a substantial investment that might be expected to be enjoyed by several generations of the family, fashion was slow to change. Mass production and reduced costs made china more vulnerable to sudden changes in fashion, and manufacturers were obliged to introduce larger numbers of new patterns while retaining in production ever larger numbers of those which earlier customers expected to be able to replace.

Josiah Wedgwood was at first reluctant to accept orders for crested or armorial ware, explaining to Thomas Bentley as early as 1766 - Crests are very bad things for us to meddle with ... plain ware, if it should not happen to be firsts (perfect) you will take off my hands as seconds (sell as substandard), which if crested would be as useless as most other crests and crest wearers are.

By 1776, however, he was obliged to admit that the painting of arms is now become serious business, and I must either lose or gain a great deal of business by it. However I must at all events come into it. As the crest order books preserved in the Wedgwood Museum testify, armorial ware became an essential, though always doubtfully profitable, part of the range of Wedgwood’s Queen’s Ware, originally created in honour of Queen Charlotte, wife of George III.

It is known that Jane Austen was very well acquainted with Wedgwood. She (or her family) seems to have had their own set, for on 6 June 1811 she wrote to Cassandra, on Monday I had the pleasure of receiving, unpacking and approving our Wedgwood ware. It all came very safely and upon the whole is a good match, tho’ I think they might have allowed us rather larger leaves, especially in such a year of fine foliage as this... There was no bill with the goods but that shall not screen them from being paid. I mean to ask Martha (Lloyd, a great friend of the Austens, later the wife of Jane’s brother Francis) to settle the account. It will be quite in her way for she is now just sending my mother a breakfast set from the same place. I hope it will come by the Waggon tomorrow; it is certainly what we want, and I long to know what it is like. Unfortunately the Wedgwood Museum cannot trace either the first mentioned set or the breakfast set, nor has a picture of it been located.

On 16 September 1813, Jane was writing to Cassandra, this time from London: We then went to Wedgwood’s where my brother and Fanny (Edward Austen Knight and Jane’s favourite niece) chose a dinner set. I beleive the pattern is a small Lozenge in purple, between Lines of narrow gold, and it is to have the crest. The Wedgwood Museum notes that the pattern is evidently our No. 424 in Josiah Wedgwood’s first pattern book and adds the first order appeared in their books 18 September 1813 with a repeat order for exactly the same pattern and crest on 10 May 1827. The Museum still possesses the original copper plates (1956) from which the crest of Jane’s brother was printed.

Several pieces have been loaned by the descendants of Jane’s brother Edward’s family to the Jane Austen House Museum at Chawton. Jane spent weeks at a time at her brother’s home and must have used, seen and eaten from these dishes many times. Illustrated here, pictured at Jane’s house, reposing on an early Regency dining table which was also hers, are a covered soup tureen, a large dish, one smaller dish and one large and one small plate, all edged, as Jane describes with a small lozenge in purple between lines of narrow gold, and with Edward’s crest, the element Wedgwood had so reluctantly incorporated into his designs.

Edward Austen Knight's Wedgwood dinner set.

Part of Edward Austen Knight’s crested Wedgwood dinner set at the JA House Museum in Chawton. Picture: JA House Museum.

Alan Landis

Bibliography
Wedgwood’s No.1 Apr 13-14. 1956

LINK: Top of page
________________________________ 

 

Poetry with some Prejudice

Pat Shepherd’s after dinner talk at the Conference included a feast of well chosen and presented poetry loved and used by Jane Austen, from which these are extracted.

The Austen family were addicted to poetry writing. They would burst into verse to celebrate family happenings, to accompany gifts. Jane’s brother James was the most prolific writer, about 40 of his poems being still extant. Mrs Austen was a poet from a very early age, and in her later years, after a serious illness which was treated by an apothecary called Bowen, she wrote the following:

Dialogue between Death and Mrs Austen.

Says Death ‘I’ve been trying these three weeks or more
To seize an Old Madam here at number four,
Yet I still try in vain, tho’ she’d turned of threescore,
To what is my ill success oweing?’
I’ll tell you, old Fellow, if you cannot guess,
To what you’re indebted for your ill success;
To the prayers of my Husband, whose love I possess.
To the care of my Daughters, whom Heaven will bless;
To the skill and attention of Bowen.

I must risk the wrath of some members by saying I don’t think Jane’s poetry particularly good, though in the following verse we can recognise her sense of humour:

On the marriage of Miss Camilla Wallop & the Rev HenryWake.

Camilla, good-humoured and merry and small
For a husband was at her last stake;
And having in vain danced at many a Ball
Is now happy to jump at a Wake.

In her only surviving piece of serious verse she mourns the death of her friend, Mrs Lefroy, who was killed while riding on Jane’s birthday. Though her grief was undoubtedly genuine, the work seems to me too conventional and forced; I quote only the two opening verses and the final one:

To the Memory of Mrs Lefroy, who died Dec 16 – my Birthday. Written 1808

The day returnes again, my natal day;
What mix’d emotions with the Thought arise!
Beloved friend,’ four years have pass’d away
Since thou wert snatched forever from our eyes.
The day, commemorative of my birth
Bestowing Life and Light and Hope on me,
Brings back the hour which was thy last on earth.
Oh! bitter pang of torturing Memory!

...

Fain would I feel a union in thy fate.
Fain would I seek to draw an omen fair
From this connection in our Earthly date.
Indulge the harmless weakness - Reason, spare.

Jane herself realised that her genius was for the novel, not poetry; when Sir Walter Scott began to write novels, she complained that he had …

no business to write novels, especially good ones. It is not fair. He has fame and profit enough as a poet and should not be taking the bread out of other people’s mouths.

Who were the poets current in Jane’s lifetime? Among others, Scott, Cowper, Byron, Coleridge and Shelley. In 1798 Wordsworth and Coleridge published the first edition of Lyrical Ballads and started the great shift to the Romantic period. As many have commented, Jane Austen’s taste ran more to the 18th century, but she was quite familiar with the works of the Bad Lord Byron - as who was not? In Persuasion we have the bereaved Captain Benwick referring to The Giaour and The Bride of Abydos, reciting with ‘tremulous feeling’ to Anne Elliot verses which reflect his emotions:

from The Giaour, by Byron

The cold in clime are cold in blood,
Their love can scarce deserve the name;
But mine was like the lava flood
That boils in Aetna’s breast of flame.
I cannot prate in puling strain
Of ladye-love and beauty’s chain:
If changing cheek, and scorching vein,
Lips taught to writhe, but not complain,
If bursting heart, and madd’ning brain,
And daring deed, and vengeful steel,
and all that I have felt, and feel
Betoken love - that love was mine,
And shown by many a bitter sign.

from The Bride of Abydos by Byron

By Helle’s stream there is a voice of wail!
And woman’s eye is wet - man’s cheek is pale:
Zuleika! last of Giaffir’s race,
Thy destined lord is come too late:
He sees not - ne’er shall see thy face!

He was thy hope - thy joy - thy love - thine all,
And that last thought on him thou couldst not save
Sufficed to kill;
Burst forth in one wild cry - and all was still.
Peace to thy broken heart, and virgin grave!

That Anne feels something self-indulgent in his performance is shown by her gentle suggestion:

she ventured to hope he did not always read only poetry; and to say, that she thought it was the misfortune of poetry, to be seldom safely enjoyed by those who enjoyed it completely; and that the strong feelings which alone could estimate it truly, were the very feelings which ought to taste it but sparingly. Persuasion, Ch.14

Her instinct is proved correct when his ‘undying’ love for the late Fanny Harville starts to transfer itself first to Anne, then finally to Louisa Musgrove. A clear case of being in love with his own emotions.

In Sense and Sensibility Marianne Dashwood reveals a similar fervour regarding poetry; she complains of Edward Ferrars’ reading of Cowper as being ‘spiritless’ and ‘tame’. and wonders how Elinor can listen so calmly. Again, in Sanditon, the words of Sir Edward Denham about Scott and Burns, and Charlotte’s reply reinforce our sense that Jane Austen had decided reservations about an over-emotional response to poetry.

Sir Edward Denham in Sanditon:

‘But Burns – I confess my sense of his pre-eminence Miss Heywood. – If Scott has a fault, it is the want of passion. – Tender, elegant, descriptive – but tame. – The man who cannot do justice to the attributes of woman is my contempt. Sometimes indeed a flash of feeling seems to irradiate him – as in the lines we were speaking of –‘Oh! Woman in our hours of ease’ – But Burns is always on fire. – His soul was the altar in which lovely woman sat enshrined, his spirit truly breathed the immortal incense which is her due.’

‘I have read several of Burns’ poems with great delight,’ said Charlotte as soon as she had time to speak, ‘but I am not poetic enough to separate a man’s poetry entirely from his character, – and poor Burns’ known irregularities, greatly interrupt my enjoyment of his lines. – I have difficulty depending on the truth of his feelings as a lover. I have not faith in the sincerity of the affections of a man of his description. He felt and he wrote and he forgot.’ Sanditon, Ch.7

When we meet our heroine, Catherine Morland, in Northanger Abbey, her naive susceptibility to the Gothic novel is foreshadowed in Chapter 1; we are told that she is familiar with six literary quotations; four of these are misquoted but not, I suspect, by Jane Austen. This carelessness does suggest that Catherine has acquired these fragments, not from a genuine love of poetry, but because they are desirable in the eyes of society, like a little skill in music, a small dabble with a paintbrush. Mrs Elton is quick with the odd quotation; she quotes from Gray’s Elegy, from John Gay, from Milton in a fashion which caused Ronald Blythe, editor of the Penguin Emma to write:

She is a gifted debaser of art who reduces each quotation to a sentimental cliché.

Emma herself denies the Shakespearean edict that ‘the course of true love never did run smooth’, a splendid irony when we consider that she is in the process of ruining Harriet Smith’s love-life and indeed, compromising her own. So some of Jane Austen’s creations reveal weaknesses in their response to poetry.

What of those characters who show a less emotional, more rational, more 18th century attitude? We are told that Jane’s favourite poets were Scott, George Crabbe and William Cowper. When Fanny Price expresses disappointment in the chapel at Sotherton, Mr Rushworth’s estate, she refers closely to Scott’s Lay of the Last Minstrel:

from The Lay of the Last Minstrel by Scott

Full many a scutcheon and banner riven,
Shook to the cold night-wind of heaven,
Around the screenéd altar’s pale;
And there the dying lamps did burn,
Before thy low and lonely urn,
0 gallant chief of Otterburne!

Breathes there the man, with soul so dead,
Who never to himself hath said,
This is my own, my native land!
Whose heart hath ne’er within him burned,
As home his footsteps he hath turned,
From wandering on a foreign strand!
If such there be, go, mark him well;
For him no Minstrel raptures swell;
High though his titles, proud his name,
Boundless his wealth as wish can claim;
Despite those titles, power, and pelf,
The wretch, concentred all in self,
Living, shall forfeit fair renown,
And, doubly dying, shall go down
To the vile dust, from whence he sprung,
Unwept, unhonoured and unsung.

The poem I would like to quote from Crabbe is a part of The Parish Register. To me it has an almost Chaucerian flavour:

from ‘The Parish Register’, George Crabbe (1754 - 1832)

Part 3 - Burials.

Next died the Widow Goe, an active dame,
Famed ten miles round, and worthy all her fame;
She lost her husband when their loves were young,
But kept her farm, her credit, and her tongue:
Full thirty years she ruled, with matchless skill,
With guiding judgment and resistless will;
Advice she scorned, rebellions she suppressed,
And sons and servants bowed at her behest.
Like that great man’s, who to his Saviour came,
Were the strong words of this commanding dame;-
‘Come’, if she said, they came; if ‘go’, were gone;
And if ‘do this’. - that instant it was done:

Surely that portrait would have delighted the creator of Lady Catherine de Bourgh!

And so we come to the favourite, William Cowper; most of the extracts are from his long blank verse poem, The Task, from which Mr Knightley quotes – what better recommendation could we ask? One of the great names in landscape gardening, a popular activity among the landowners of Austen’s time, was that of Capability Brown, who is not totally approved by Cowper:

from The Task, by William Cowper

Lo! he comes –
Th’ omnipotent magician, Brown, appears.
Down falls the venerable pile, th’abode
Of our forefathers, a grave whisker’d race,
But tasteless. Springs a palace in its stead,
But in a distant spot; where more expos’d it may enjoy
th’advantage of the north
And aguish east, till time shall have transform’d
Those naked acres to a sheltering grove.

He speaks. The lake in front becomes a lawn,
Woods vanish, hills subside, and vallies rise,
And streams, as if created for his use,
Pursue the track of his directing wand,
Sinuous or straight, now rapid and now slow,
Now murm’ring soft, now roaring in cascades,
Ev’n as he bids.

Elizabeth Bennet’s reaction to the grounds of Pemberley reflect a similar preference for a natural, rather than contrived landscape:

Pemberley House ... was a large, handsome stone building, standing well on rising ground and backed by a ridge of high woody hills; – and in front, a stream of some natural importance was swelled into greater, but without any artificial appearance. Its banks were neither formal, nor falsely adorned. Elizabeth was delighted. Ch 63

A similar feeling for nature is shown by Fanny Price when Rushworth proposes changes at Sotherton; she says, ‘Cut down an avenue! What a pity! Does it not make you think of Cowper? Ye fallen avenues, once more I mourn your fate unmerited’. This was not a new thought from the poet; the same idea is expressed in an earlier poem, The Poplar Field:

The Poplar Field by William Cowper

The poplars are fell’d, farewell to the shade
And the whispering sound of the cool colonnade,
The winds play no longer, and sing in the leaves
Nor Ouse on his bosom their image receives.

The novels suggest that Jane certainly preferred the country-side to city life – she did not want to live in Bath, any more than Anne Elliot did. The charming villains, the Crawfords, come from London to corrupt the peace of Mansfield Park. I have to admit the Gardiners also come from London, but not the fashionable part! And Cowper expresses some criticism of London in The Task (p415):

... where has commerce such a mart,
So rich, so throng’d, enlarged, and still
Increasing London? Babylon of old
Not more the glory of the earth, than she,
A more accomplished world’s chief glory now.
She has her praise. Now mark a spot or two
That so much beauty would do well to purge;
And show this queen of cities, that so fair
May yet be foul, so witty, yet not wise.
It is not seemly, nor of good report,
That she is slack in discipline. More prompt
T’avenge than to prevent the breach of law.
That she is rigid in denouncing death
On petty robbers, and indulges life
And liberty, and oft-times honour too
To peculators of the public gold.
That thieves at home must hang; but he that puts
Into his overgorged and bloated purse
The wealth of Indian provinces, escapes.

God made the country, and man made the town.
What wonder then, that health and virtue, gifts
That can alone make sweet the bitter draught
That life holds out to all, should most abound
And least be threatened in the fields and groves?

We know of Jane’s reluctance to dedicate Emma to the Prince Regent because of her dislike of his character; the following comments on heroes and kings in The Task would, one imagines, meet with her approval:

We love
The king who loves the law, respects his bounds
And reigns content within them. Him we serve
Freely and with delight, who leaves us free.
But recollecting still that he is man,
We trust him not too far. King, though he be,
And king in England too, he may be weak
And vain enough to be ambitious still,
May exercise amiss his proper pow’rs,
Or covet more than freemen chuse to grant:
Beyond that mark is treason. He is ours,
T’administer. to guard, t’adorn the state,
But not to warp or change it. We are his,
To serve him nobly in the common cause
True to the death, but not to be his slaves.
The less dedicated members of the clergy too come in for Cowper’s
criticism:

from The Task, by Cowper (p428)

I venerate the man, whose heart is warm,
Whose hands are pure, whose doctrine and whose life
Coincident, exhibit lucid proof
That he is honest in the sacred cause.
To such I render more than mere respect,
Whose actions say that they respect themselves.
But loose in morals, and in manners vain,
In conversation frivolous, in dress
Extreme, at once rapacious and profuse,
Frequent in park, with lady at his side,
Ambling and prattling scandal as he goes,
But rare at home, and never at his books,
Or with his pen, save when he scrawls a card;
Constant at routs, familiar with a round
Of ladyships, a stranger to the poor;
Ambitious of preferment for its gold,
And well-prepar’d by ignorance and sloth,
By infidelity and love o’ th’ world,
To make God’s work a sinecure; a slave
To his own pleasures and his patron’s pride.

Some people have said that Jane does not treat all members of the clergy respectfully. Certainly Cowper’s words, ‘his patron’s pride’ lead us directly to Mr Collins and Lady Catherine. I believe that living so closely to the church and its affairs would inevitably make such a shrewd observer look with eyes unclouded by an automatic reverence for the clergy and their doings.

The slave trade is mentioned a couple of times in the novels; Mrs Elton accidentally discloses some of her ‘trade’ origins when Jane Fairfax compares the situation of a governess with that of a slave. More seriously, the wealth and comfort of Mansfield Park is based on the sugar plantations of Antigua. Cowper states - even shouts - his opinion:

from The Task, by Cowper (p 418)

... My ear is pained,
My soul is sick with every day’s report
Of wrong and outrage with which earth is filled.
There is no flesh in man’s obdurate heart

It does not feel for man. The nat’ral bond
Of brotherhood is sever’d as the flax
That falls asunder at the touch of fire.
He finds his fellow guilty of a skin
Not colour’d like his own, and having pow’r
T’inforce the wrong, for such a worthy cause
Dooms and devotes him as his lawful prey.
Lands intersected by a narrow frith
Abhor each other. Mountains interposed
Make enemies of nations who had else
Like kindred drops been mingled into one.
Thus man devotes his brother, and destroys;
And worse than all, and most to be deplored
As human nature’s broadest, foulest blot,
Chains him, and tasks him, and exacts his sweat
With stripes, that mercy with a bleeding heart
Weeps when she sees inflicted on a beast.
Then what is man? And what man seeing this,
And having human feelings, does not blush
And hang his head, to think himself a man?
I would not have a slave to till my ground,
To carry me, to fan me while I sleep,
And tremble when I wake, for all the wealth
That sinews bought and sold have ever earn’d.
No: dear as freedom is, and in my heart’s
Just estimation priz’d above all price,\
I had much rather be myself the slave
And wear the bonds, than fasten them on him.
We have no slaves at home. - Then why abroad?

The final selection shows Cowper’s own feelings about being a poet; - a glimpse into the creative thought processes of the poet whom Jane Austen, that supreme creative artist, revered above all others:

from The Task by Cowper, p 426.

There is a pleasure in poetic pains
Which only poets know. The shifts and turns,
Th’expedients and inventions multiform
To which the mind resorts, in chase of terms
Though apt, yet coy, and difficult to win -
T’arrest the fleeting images that fill
The mirror of the mind, and hold them fast,
And force them sit, till he has pencil’d off
A faithful likeness of the forms he views;
Then to dispose his copies with such art
That each may find its most propitious light,
And shine by situation, hardly less,
Than by the labor and the skill it cost,
Are occupations of the poet’s mind
So pleasing, and that steal away the thought
With such address, from themes of sad import,
That lost in his own musings, happy man!
He feels th’anxieties of life, denied
Their wonted entertainment, all retire.
Such joys has he that sings.

Pat Shepherd

LINK: Top of page
________________________________ 

 

The Four of Spades from an 1832 card deck by Baron Louis Athlin.

Right: Can you spot the hidden spades? The Four of Spades from an 1832 card deck by Baron Louis Athlin. (from www.pemberley.com/janeinfo/

Lives of Leisure at Mansfield Park

Study Day 2000

(See also the Mansfield Park crossword.)

What would entice 100 people to stay indoors on a beautiful autumn Saturday in May? The opportunity to learn about the various leisure activities of the gentle folk in Jane Austen’s time!

Mansfield Park, the book, not the controversial film that had been released shortly before, provided a wonderful focus for the day’s activities.

The groups were ably led by Pamela Whalan with Yvette Field, Janette Emmerson, Sheila Edwards and Judy Greenway making enlightening and delightful contributions throughout the day. The culmination was the excerpt from the play, Lovers’ Vows, the centre of controversy in Mansfield Park.

Yvette Field’s introduction looked at the comfortable, elegant mansion of Mansfield Park, surrounded by its own parkland, providing the environment for the leisure activities and cultivated enjoyment for the wealthy Bertram family. She added ...

The leisured class at the end of 20 years of war with France needed to feel exclusive. They wanted to enclose themselves and their cultivated traditions, away from the general prosperity of a growing number of British subjects of the lower orders.

... It was a beautiful land then. Glimpses of it can be seen in modern England, but much of the land has been built on and many of the great houses have disappeared. The general population then had the confidence in their way of life of a people who have never known invasion. Even a labourer’s cottage garden could provide plenty of food, and craftsmen and tenant farmers, merchants and manufacturers were prosperous enough to command some of the best of English goods and had money to provide leisure activities for their families. Nevertheless 

the greatest upsurge of wealth, based mainly on agriculture – and sometimes, as in Sir Thomas’s case, on overseas ventures – was for the landed gentry.

...The wealthy [members of this class] associated with each other largely away from the public eye...

We tested some of the activities of this leisured class for ourselves – the card game Speculation, musical entertainment, reading aloud, and amateur theatricals. Riding, horseracing, dancing and charades were a little ambitious for the day!

The first requirement for each group was what quickly became a quite hilarious discussion of vices and virtues of the Mansfield characters. Bertha McKenzie had suggested, on the basis of a lecture by Penny Gay some years ago, that in Mansfield Park many images of the characters at play correspond to the seven deadly sins. Lively discussion ensued as participants matched vice to character, citing a fondly remembered incident or quote. It was (almost) unanimously agreed that Fanny Price held all seven of the virtues listed. However, no character was ‘evil’ enough to display all the vices in one person, although Mrs Norris came close!

The camaraderie established at each table by this activity changed once we had the chance to engage in the game of Speculation. Rules were provided and explained, and what seemed to be very complex turned into quite a simple game, once its principles were grasped. Amidst much laughter, there was serious gambling of plastic ‘chips’ taking place in the church hall, with some people being consistent winners – such as Geraldine Rawlings, Pam Nutt, Rodney Pyne and Jan Yelland, who followed the lead of Mary Crawford:

There, I will stake my last like a woman of spirit. No cold prudence for me, I am not born to sit still and do nothing. If I lose the game, it shall not be from not striving for it.

We were informed about the types of activities that were ‘seasonal’, May, June and July being the height of the social season of parties and balls on Wednesday and Saturday evenings in London. The seasons for grouse, partridge and pheasant shooting occurred from August to October. Men who could afford it, after instructing their steward or other servants, then had time to ride, shoot or hunt whilst in the country or attend the club when in town. We were even given a map of England showing the places mentioned in the text, with a presumed position of Mansfield Park, giving a clearer picture of how much time, energy and organisation were needed for what we would consider now to be quite short distances.

A map of England showing the places mentioned in the text, with a presumed position of Mansfield Park, giving a clearer picture of how much time, energy and organisation were needed for what we would consider now to be quite short distances.

After dinner it was usual for family and visitors to converse together, or play cards or parlour games. As books and candles were very expensive in Jane Austen’s time, reading aloud, singing and other activities that we now usually do individually, were much more sociable occasions. It was a social obligation to be a good reader or a good listener.

Pamela Whalan spoke on references to reading aloud in the novels, and particularly on the impact that Henry Crawford’s excellent reading has on Fanny’s view of him...

... in Mr Crawford’s reading there was a variety of excellence beyond what she had ever met with...he could always light, at will, on the best scene, or the best speeches ...; and whether it was dignity or pride, or tenderness or remorse, or whatever were to be expressed, he could do it with equal beauty. It was truly dramatic.

Edmund watched the progress of her attention, and was amused and gratified by seeing how she gradually slackened in the needle-work, which, at the beginning, seemed to occupy her totally, how it fell from her hand while she sat motionless over it – and at last, how the eyes which had appeared so studiously to avoid him throughout the day, were turned and fixed on Crawford, fixed on him for minutes, fixed on him in short till the attraction drew Crawford’s upon her, and the book was closed, and the charm was broken.

Some of these same Shakespearean passages treated so well by Henry Crawford, from Act II of Henry VIII were ‘read aloud’ to us by Jason Murdoch, of the Hunters Hill Drama Group. Yes, an intelligent reading does make a difference to comprehension and appreciation.

Even stargazing, which had obviously been a favoured leisure activity for Edmund and Fanny, was discussed. You will recall it was interrupted, to Fanny’s disappointment, when Edmund was irresistibly drawn away to Mary Crawford and the ‘glee’.   Janette Emmerson, who discussed the incidence and importance of music in the texts, introduced a delightful glee of our own, sung in harmony by Judy Greenway, Sue Lack and friends. The glee however was not usually sung for an audience, but for the pleasure of the participants around the piano. 

Stargazing interrupted... A woodcut for Mansfield Park by Joan Hassall.

A major highlight of the day was the re-enactment of Lovers’ Vows. To a modern audience it is melodrama – a marvellous and completely ‘over the top’ performance by Julia Redlich and the Hunters Hill Drama Group. However, Fanny Price was justified in her unease about its performance, and Sir Thomas Bertram finally took his rightful place as moral guardian of the family in his condemnation of it. There is much to consider about how the various characters in the book were involved and influenced by this play and the opportunities Jane Austen gives us to judge a person’s worth. It was fitting to have the ending of this play as a conclusion to the day, but not an end to thoughtful reflection of what had been learnt. Of course there was always the crossword to complete at home if you had been too busy catching up with old friends and meeting new ones during the lunch break.

Being an English teacher, I loved the opportunity this day gave me to return to the text, to justify my opinions, refresh memories and, each time, to see another excellent example of Jane Austen’s craft. Thank you, Pamela, and everyone who so generously prepared the material and the day for us.

Kerry Underhill

LINK: Top of page
________________________________ 

 

Beau Nash

That the elder ladies and
children be contented with a second bench at the ball, as being past or not come to perfection.

Rule VIII of Nash’s RULES by general Consent determined. (from www.nwta. com/couriers/7-97/ polite.html)

 

Richard ‘Beau’ Nash

During Maggie Lane’s excellent talk at the Leura Conference on Bath, The Epitome Of Elegance, the name of Beau Nash (pictured left) was referred to. Being curious to know about the background of this unusual man, I decided to do a little reading on the subject. Although he died before Jane Austen was born he had such an influence on Bath that it is worth recording something about him.

Richard ‘Beau’ Nash was born in 1674 in Swansea, Wales. His father, also Richard, was a partner in a glass-making factory. I could find nothing about siblings so he may have been an only child. Little is known about the young Richard except that he was reputed to have ‘a natural vivacity’.

At twelve he was sent to the Free Grammar School of Queen Elizabeth in Carnarthen 20 miles north of Swansea where he distinguished himself as an athlete, particularly it seems at both forward and backward standing jumps.

From the Grammar School he went to Jesus College, Oxford, to read Law. He did not shine at his studies and was sent down some time later for becoming embroiled with too many women, probably of the wrong sort. With the financial backing of his father he then became an ensign in the Guards but soon found both the obligations of the Army and the lack of ready money a problem. He persuaded his father to let him revert to the study of Law, this time at the Inner Temple in London.

Nash was a dandy from a young age, sporting a velvet coat, ruffles, diamond buckles and a diamond brooch, and soon became aware that he possessed a certain style and manner which attracted people to him. He was not well off but supplemented his income by gambling, at which he appears to have been extraordinarily successful. He was by now a well-known young man-about-town and was welcomed into society.

Nash gradually lost interest in the Law and in 1705 decided to try his luck in Bath, which was just beginning to become popular as a health spa. He became acquainted with the then Master of Ceremonies, Captain Webster, and was soon appointed his assistant. Shortly afterwards the unfortunate Captain was killed in a sword-fighting duel and Nash, still in his early thirties, found himself elected by the Corporation of Bath as the new Master of Ceremonies. Because of the recent disaster Nash began his term by abolishing the wearing of swords and, ipso facto, the abandonment of duelling came about. He next insisted that all lodging houses, most of which were damp and dilapidated, must be renovated and he himself fixed a tariff for every room.

In 1708 Nash arranged for an Assembly House to be built and levied a subscription on all visitors to Bath. As Maggie Lane told us, he forbade all private parties (what power!) but invited everyone to the Assembly House for dinners, teas, breakfast concerts and balls. On the orders of the resident doctor who was concerned for the health of those who had come ‘to take the waters’, and with the concurrence of Nash, all balls began at 6pm and finished precisely at eleven.

A list of rules was drawn up and deportment at dances was strictly regulated. Nash even forbade ‘exhibitions of resentment from either gentlemen or ladies, (who displayed it) on the grounds that someone had danced
out of turn.’ He ridiculed, and so made unfashionable, the wearing of boots in the Assembly House and let it be known that swearing was out of
order.

Most things in Bath seem to have cost a great deal of money, e.g. a crown for pen and paper to write a letter and up to a guinea to borrow books from the bookseller. Amazingly enough there was no revolt against either the restrictions or the charges and it is reported that guests were pleased to obey.

Just prior to 1720 Nash arranged for a large ballroom to be added to the Assembly House. Later on he was involved in the encouragement and employment of architect John Wood who is famous for his wonderful Bath buildings. This was the beginning of the expansion of Bath as many more visitors, including artists and writers, members of the aristocracy and later royalty, started to arrive. It is of interest that Nash was famous enough to rate a mention in Henry Fielding’s Tom Jones in the chapter called ‘The History of Mrs Fitzpatrick’. His name can also be come across in Georgette Heyer’s novels.

During the period 1720 to the 1740s Beau Nash lead a busy life. As well as other duties he organised the recreations of the day, arranged for the ringing of bells to announce the arrival of distinguished guests to Bath, visited the new arrivals to pay his respects, arbitrated differences between neighbours or visitors and solicited subscriptions for his latest plan, a hospital. In 1735 he was also installed as Master of Ceremonies at Tunbridge Wells where he enforced similar rules to those at Bath.

Nash was a prodigious gambler but went to a great deal of trouble to prevent others less experienced than he from losing all their money. He had long been a dandy and an arbiter of fashion, and it was said that his well-known white hat was awarded more respect than many a general. There is a lovely quote from Lord Chesterfield describing the Beau at a ball

He wore his gold-laced clothes on the occasion, and looked so fine that, standing by chance in the middle of the dancers, he was taken by many at a distance for a gilt garland.

Although an earlier law against gambling had been enacted, Nash and his fellow players, male and female, had managed to get around this by various means including the invention of new games. However in 1745 the anti-gambling law was tightened. Although the popularity of Bath continued this was a great drawback to Nash, not only because of being a successful gambler on his own account, but because he had awarded himself as Master of Ceremonies a percentage of all winnings. From this time on his fortunes and his influence gradually declined. He had been the epitome of the benevolent dictator, an imperious rule-maker who nevertheless showed great generosity to those who had come across hard times. He now found himself in the same predicament, and had to sell most of his possessions to survive. He died in straitened circumstances in 1762, aged 87.

Beau Nash never married but had a relationship of many years standing with one Fanny Murray. After she left him he took up with Juliana Papjoy who was his companion and who cared for him until his death.

The name of Richard ‘Beau’ Nash is intricately entwined with that of Bath and it could be said that the city itself is his monument. It seems to me that here was a man who was able to use his talents in a way that suited him and who more than many of us, truly found his niche in life.

Halcyon Evans

Notes taken from Beau Nash: Monarch of Bath and Tunbridge Wells, Willard Connely

LINK: Top of page
________________________________ 

 

A beautiful, indolent Lady Bertram

A beautiful, indolent Lady B? From http://www.pemberley .com/ janeinfo/

Mansfield Park and Beauty

Knowing my interest in Professor John Sutherland’s Puzzle books, (see page 29, June Newsletter) our Editor drew my attention to a chapter headed ‘Pug: dog or bitch?’ (a debate mentioned in a previous Newsletter) in the volume entitled Can Jane Eyre be Happy?. Professor Sutherland quotes from Mansfield Park, asserting that in Chapter 2 we are told that Lady Bertram is ‘a woman… of little use & no beauty, thinking more of her pug than her children’. He goes on to say… ‘We are to assume that the un-beautiful & useless Lady Bertram, like other dog lovers, has come to resemble her pet.’(!) Later on, in his notes on that chapter, he gives us the full text, which reads:

She was a woman who spent her days in sitting nicely dressed on a sofa, doing some long piece of needlework, of little use & no beauty, thinking more of her pug than her children.

He concedes that it could be the needlework which is ‘of little use and no beauty’ (which has always been our reading) but says that he prefers to think that Austen meant Lady Bertram.

Our Editor and I are ready to agree with Professor Sutherland that Lady Bertram is ‘of little use’, but not with his conclusion that she is a woman of no beauty. In the very first chapter we are told that she was able to captivate Sir Thomas Bertram, even though she had only £7000. One can only assume that he was captivated by her beauty, not by her mind or wit, and her claim to good looks is established when we learn that some of their acquaintances thought ‘Miss Ward & Miss Frances quite as handsome as Miss Maria.’

Of course, by the time Fanny arrives at Mansfield and we meet Lady Bertram ensconced on her sofa, she has been married for some years, with four children, the eldest 17 and the youngest 12. We are told that they are ‘a remarkably fine family; the sons very well-looking and the daughters decidedly handsome’ and it is reasonable to assume that they have inherited at least some of their good looks from their mother. Despite her lethargy we can guess that Lady Bertram enjoys the best of health and the pampered ease in which she lives is surely the best preservative of youthful beauty. When she hears of Crawford’s proposal, she looks at Fanny ‘complacently’ and remarks: ‘Humph – we are certainly a handsome family.’ This does not sound like someone who has lost all traces of an early beauty.

When Fanny arrives in Portsmouth her mother greets her with kindness and with ‘features which Fanny loved the more because they brought her Aunt Bertram’s before her’. Later on we hear that ‘The Prices were now seen to advantage. Nature had given them no inconsiderable share of beauty and every Sunday dressed them in their cleanest skins & attire.’ Fanny thinks that ‘her mother did not look so very unworthy of being Lady Bertram’s sister as she was but too apt to look.’ We learn that it had ‘often grieved her – to think of the contrast between them – to think that where nature had made so little difference circumstances should have made so much, and that her mother, as handsome as Lady Bertram and some years her junior, should have an appearance so much more worn and faded.’

Knowing what we do about Lady Bertram’s indolence and her tendency to drop off into a gentle doze at the slightest opportunity, I am ready to believe that her skill at needlework is on a par with her grasp of the rules of Speculation, and that her work was undoubtedly a thing of neither use nor beauty. As for her own person, that is quite another thing, and I am prepared to defend her, being equally ready to believe that she has retained much of the good looks which first ensnared the worthy Sir Thomas.

Marjorie Jones

LINK: Top of page
________________________________ 

Portrait of Cassandra Austen?

This portrait has also been acquired by the Jane Austen Memorial Trust in Chawton. Its provenance and similarities with the portrait of Jane painted by her sister Cassandra, suggest that this may in fact be a portrait of Cassandra.

It is believed (or hoped) to be the portrait mentioned by Lord Brabourne as being in his family’s hands, in 1884 when he was about to publish a selection of Jane’s letters. Lord Brabourne was a descendant of Edward Austen Knight through his daughter Fanny, Lady Knatchbull.

We are much indebted to our Conference speaker Maggie Lane for bringing these Trust treasures to our attention.

Portrait of Cassandra Austen???

LINK: Top of page
________________________________ 

Photo: Cassandra's silver teapot

Cassandra's Silver Teapot

This attractive sterling silver teapot, hallmarked 1832, and bearing the Austen family ‘stag’ crest has been donated to the Jane Austen Memorial Trust at Chawton, and is believed to have been the property of Cassandra Austen.

The Trust’s information is that when Cassandra died in 1845 she left much of her estate to their brother, Charles, whose daughter Cassy Esten Austen arranged distribution amongst their branch of the Austen family, this piece coming to Emma Florence Austen, grand-daughter of Charles, great niece of Jane & Cassandra Austen.

In 1926, in straitened circumstances, Emma Austen found it necessary to sell, and the piece came into the very safe hands of Dr R W Chapman, who added a broad knowledge of silverware to his recognised eminence in JA scholarship. It is through the Chapman family that the piece comes to the Memorial Trust.

It is fascinating to think that since Jane was the household member who cared for and served the precious tea in their Chawton home, she may well have used this herself. It is now returned to that Chawton home, now the Trust’s museum, waiting for you to visit it!

 

Kim Hicks

Courtship

Every once in a while it is beneficial to return to the roots of our involvement in the life and times of Jane Austen. At our September meeting Kim Hicks helped us to return to the elegance, intelligence and beauty of the works that Miss Austen wrote, not by giving us a literary critique or a talk on manners of the period, but by speaking the words that Austen wrote, and doing it extremely well.

A very simple stage was set – a chair, a small table and several books. Dressed in a green and white round gown in the style of the early 19th century – a dress any lady in a country village would have been happy to wear when visiting her neighbours – Kim Hicks proceeded to charm the audience with an interesting selection from the works of Jane Austen based on the theme of courtship.

Her intelligent interpretation of familiar passages, and her very polished performance technique displayed the wit, the humour and the command of the English language for which Jane Austen is revered.

There were some very funny episodes from the Juvenilia, a number of readings from Pride and Prejudice including Mr Collins’ proposal – a scene which brought out the absurdity of the situation but also showed the pomposity and presumption of the man in a way which, I am sure, would have delighted Miss Austen.

We were also treated to the tender scene in which Mr Knightley proposes in the novel Emma but I think that my very favourite was the scene from Northanger Abbey where Isabella Thorpe makes Catherine Moreland her accomplice in chasing the young men who happened to catch her eye in the Pump Room.

Kim Hicks gave us at least as much pleasure in good reading as Henry Crawford gave Fanny Price, for Fanny was forced to listen. Reading aloud was a form of domestic entertainment at the time when these works were written, and Austen would have been aware of the sound of her work as well as the word on the page. We, too, were delighted to listen to a truly dramatic reading for Kim Hicks is quite simply an excellent actress with a rare perception into Austen’s language, and she had her audience totally enthralled.

One of the delights of the afternoon was the audience itself. People familiar with the work, lips moving as the words were spoken, who knew when the punch line was to be delivered and knew exactly what that punch line was, were finding fresh delights and unexpected nuances in the work in Miss Hicks’ intelligent and loving presentation.

We felt encouraged to read again some of these passages, to look at them anew in the light of these readings. A most successful gathering of JASA.

Pamela Whalan

LINK: Top of page
________________________________ 

The Fund-Raising Project

Our members are so generous!

As you will recall, changed circumstances demanded that the Society purchase a new computer, to produce our Sensibilities, Newsletter and Practicalities. The project was initiated at the Leura Conference in July, and continued by a letter to members immediately afterwards. We have been so touched by the extraordinarily generous response of members, and are delighted that you value your publications enough to support the Society in this way.

After the Conference a few members decided to form a ‘fundraising committee’, and it was this group who were responsible for arranging two theatre parties – to Wilde’s The Importance of being Earnest with Patricia Routledge as Lady Bracknell, and with Pamela Whalan to the Genesian’s production of Agatha Christie’s Unexpected Guest. These functions are reported on page 35 of this Newsletter. Member Jill Rogers proved that the way to make a success of a theatre party was to make personal phone calls to members, and made a resounding success of the process and the function. (I hope she realises that any demonstration of skills such as this means inevitable future calls on her by the Society!)

Together they raised the marvellous sum of $1261.90. As a part of the fundraising push, Helen Cook also organised a Christmas Hamper, income for which will be finalised at the Xmas Lunch. Our sincere thanks to all of you for your considerable efforts.

We would like to acknowledge and thank publicly each of our generous members, but so many opted not to have their gift acknowledged in this way, that we were left with only a few who were prepared to be thus recognised, which would have produced an imbalanced picture, and gave us something of a quandary. We hope we have made the right decision therefore, in not publishing any names: our thanks are not less warm.

At the time of printing, including the above theatre party and hamper income, the total received was $5456.30, from a total 157 members. We sincerely thank you all. And we’d better ensure that the standard of our publications is kept up!

We were also moved by the comments which came with your generous donations:

The publications are worth a great deal ... I hope you get the funds needed ... Keep up the good work – I couldn’t survive without JASA publications...
I would hate to see the publications disappear... May I suggest you take out theft insurance?
[done]... Good luck with the appeal. JASA publications are eminently worthwhile...You deserve the best...Due to ill health I have not been able to attend meetings, but I just love to keep in touch with the Newsletter, Sensibilities and Practicalities...Always look forward to receiving your publications, and am never disappointed with the contents or presentation...thank you, and long may you continue!... Would hate to lose or diminish our publications. They are terrific!

We spent a deal of time getting the right deal for the right computer, and the Editor had enormous satisfaction over a couple of days in October setting up the new equipment to do all the things we want it to do. This issue of Newsletter has been produced on the new equipment: however, it is only if we hadn’t been able to get such equipment that members would notice a difference – a distinct decline in design and presentation. [One thing members’ confidence does is inspire a determination to keep up and/or
improve the standard! Thanks one and all... Ed]


Illustration from http://www.pemberley.com/

LINK: Top of page
________________________________ 

JAS UK celebrates 60 years

This is Meeting quite in fairy-land. – Emma: 3:2

New President of JASNA, Joan Klingel Ray, Professor of English at the University of Colorado in Colorado Springs, reports on the English Society’s event of the year.

With 2000 being both the millennium and the sixtieth anniversary of the Jane Austen Society, our British friends decided to celebrate both events by expanding its 2000 AGM from their usual one-day JAS AGM at Chawton to three days, Friday to Sunday in July, and reaching from Winchester Cathedral in Hampshire to Box Hill in Surrey. ‘Casual elegance’ is the phrase that comes to mind to describe the three days of Austen festivities.

On Friday there was a buffet lunch and series of presentations and tours to learn about and celebrate the progress made by Sandy Lerner and her energetic team in transforming the Knight family’s former Great House into the Chawton Centre for the Study of Early English Women’s Writing, planned to open in July 2003. After the main presentations by Sandy Lerner, the invited guests, including Isobel Grundy, Marilyn Butler, Maggie Lane, Jean Bowden, Deirdre Le Faye, and Tom Carpenter, were shown around the house and grounds by Professor Michael Wheeler (Executive Director of the Chawton House Library), and Jane Alderson (Director of the Chawton Estate), together with Richard Knight (President of the JAS, a descendant of Edward Austen Knight, and a Chawton House Library Trustee) and his daughter Cassandra Knight, the landscape architect.

The weekend opened on Friday with a special late afternoon tea and brief talk about Jane Austen in Winchester by JAS Chairman, Brian Southam, in the Cathedral refectory. After Evensong at Winchester Cathedral JAS members gathered around the Memorial Window near Jane Austen’s grave in the north aisle for readings from Jane Austen’s writings.

The next unrehearsed activity I suggest would have heartily amused Jane Austen as much as it did those of us who physically attended: the rosy-cheeked, blonde-haired two-year-old daughter of Mr Crispin Drummond, the Honorary Treasurer of the JAS, came forward, clutching a posy in her chubby little hand. With a cherubic smile on her face, little Miss Drummond proceeded to lay the flowers on every grave in the area except Jane Austen’s!

The Saturday AGM was hosted by JAS President Richard Knight with charm, good humour, and great élan. Held on the lawns of Chawton House, beneath a huge white marquee, it was the central point of a delightful day, with reports from the Society and its speakers, and members and visitors strolling and picnicking on the lawns, greeting old and new acquaintances.

The most charming moment of the morning came when Joan Austen-Leigh came to the podium in a smart beige suit and large hat – looking very much the proper British lady – and reminisced about her first visit to England as a teenager to attend school. Joan had not yet read an Austen novel, and so she spent the time onboard ship struggling through Pride & Prejudice, for it is a truth universally acknowledged that young Canadian nieces must read at least one work by their British ancestor before setting foot in the old country and encountering for the first time their ‘Austen aunts’.

Many strolled down to Jane Austen’s House, where the Clementi Pianoforte, refurbished and tuned with funds contributed by JASNA members, was being played – the House had over 500 visitors that day! I had the pleasure of being invited to an elegant sit-down luncheon with Richard Knight, Claire Tomalin, Michael Wheeler, Joan Austen-Leigh, Brian Southam, and others.

The AGM Address was given by novelist Dame Joanna Trollope, OBE. Her talk had the tantalizing title, Still at Number Seven, which led to speculation: Was seven an address? Jane Austen died while writing her seventh novel, Sanditon, and so was her pen stilled at number seven? During her talk Joanna told us that she enjoyed having people puzzle over her title. As one novelist talking about another novelist, she reminded us that a good read needs a good narrative, a plot that keeps us turning the page. She then solved the puzzle for us: a popular British publication had recently printed its annual poll of its readers to name their favourite author. The top four vote-getters were writers of children’s books, including Roald Dahl and J K Rowling; slots five and six were occupied by popular novelists Catherine Cookson and Maeve Binchey; and still at number seven was Jane Austen, well ahead of Dickens and way ahead of Shakespeare.

While Austen’s wit and humour are regularly acknowledged, Trollope reminded us of how Jane Austen can pinpoint those exquisite moments of pain with which we can all identify: Marianne Dashwood callously treated by Willoughby; Emma at Box Hill reprimanded by Mr Knightley, etc. Having just read Trollope’s The Men and The Girls, I knew this author understood her subject well. The talk reminded us why Jane Austen societies the world over attract both academic and non-academic members of great allegiance.

We concluded the day by ambling down the drive to St. Nicholas Church, Chawton, for Evensong. Some people also left flowers at the graves of Cassandra and Mrs Austen, near the south wall of the church.

Sunday, the third day of the AGM, saw us drive to Box Hill for a picnic, where I am pleased to report that everyone was clever, and no one uttered an insulting or unkind word. We were reminded of the irony of Emma’s poor behaviour at Box Hill: she could view miles of landscape from here, but she was blind to her interior self and to the needs of those about her.

Kudos to Susan McCartan, the organiser of the three days of JAS AGM events, and I thank Richard Knight, Brian Southam, and Susan for their many kindnesses that made me feel so very welcome.

After I left Chawton on Tuesday, I headed to Bath to visit the newly opened Jane Austen Centre on Gay Street. This is a private enterprise, but the Jane Austen Society provided advice and help, and Maggie Lane gave great assistance in ensuring accuracy. The Centre has no artefacts, but I found it to be an excellent educational centre to introduce persons to Austen and her times. While in Bath I also had the opportunity for coffee and a chat with Kim Hicks, who performed Courtship in Australia and who will be performing it at JASNA’s AGM in Boston in mid-October.

One of the very best things about being a member of a Jane Austen Society, whether in North America, England, or Australia, is meeting amiable persons from all over the world, with whom we share an interest – Jane Austen! I look forward to meeting you at your July 2001 conference.

The exercise has, I believe, demonstrated the strength of the Society, as well as the generosity and commitment of the members.

LINK: Top of page
________________________________ 

 

A literary coup at work

Wills for the Austen and related families

As promised in the June issue of Newsletter, the current Sensibilities issue contains another in the series of Austen family wills, so generously shared with us by member Dr Jon Spence. Last time we published the Will of John Austen, from whom much of the Austen money came – though not to Jane’s side of the family. This present Will is that of Theophilus Leigh of Adlestrop, great grandfather of Jane’s mother Cassandra (nee Leigh), who can be seen as the source of funds from the maternal side of the family.

There are, you might recall, more than a dozen of these Wills that Jon has collected, which add considerable insights to the biographical interpretation of Jane Austen and her family. As well as offering them free to our members by publishing them as a series in successive Sensibilities, we propose to ask members at the Annual General Meeting (17 February) to support a plan to publish them in book form, as a superb primary resource for Jane Austen academics.

The promotion of this new publication is the major task. We anticipate producing it on our new computer, so costs should only be for printing. We propose to use email to put the project before the universities and academics of the world (a very much cheaper process than printing and mailing), and would like to see this collected resource in the markets in the first half of 2001.

This is a giant step the Society is proposing, and one which will undoubtedly enhance JASA’s reputation. From a research point of view we believe that these Wills should be published, and we are hopeful that we will receive members’ support for the venture. If you cannot attend the AGM, you may wish to voice your view on the attached Order Form.

LINK: Top of page
________________________________ 

 

News, Views & Titbits

– Keen to meet with other Janeites but don’t live in Sydney?

Members in Sydney are lucky enough to be able to attend the regular meetings every two months to talk about ‘things Jane’. It has been difficult for out-of-Sydney members to meet, apart from study days, conferences and other member events.

Such ‘out-of-Sydney’ members may see some value in being put in touch with other members living in the same area, allowing them to meet informally from time to time if they wish. Specifically, we’re hoping to set up informal groups in Canberra, Brisbane, and the Blue Mountains.

JASA president, Susannah Fullerton, will willingly assist any such group with advice or a talk if they wish.

If you are interested in meeting with fellow Janeites from time to time and live in Canberra, you can contact Jessie Terry on (02) 6286 8665. If you are in the Blue Mountains, contact Elizabeth Lindsay on (02) 4399 2983. Otherwise, you can also contact me on (02) 9569 9823 after hours or email diannespeakman@hotmail.com.

LINK: Top of page
________________________________

– Harry Potter & Jane Austen!

Curious to find out just why the Harry Potter books, by J K Rowling, have so enthralled young readers, I borrowed the first volume, Harry Potter & the Philosopher’s Stone from my young grandson.

Harry is a wizard and attends Hogwarts School of Witchcraft & Wizardry. The caretaker of that establishment, a sneaky, unpleasant character by the name of Filch, is always on the lookout for pupils who may be breaking the rules or simply doing something of which he does not approve. He has a cat - ‘a scrawny, dust-covered creature, with bulging lamplike eyes’, which he uses as a sort of deputy in his battles with the students ‘Break a rule in front of her and she’d whisk off for Filch, who’d appear, wheezing, two seconds later.’

The name of this nasty feline? Mrs Norris! How appropriate!

By the way, I have just borrowed the second book, Harry Potter & the Chamber of Secrets and expect to enjoy it as I did the first, my pleasure enhanced by the knowledge that J K Rowling shares my passion for the works of Jane Austen.

Marjorie Jones

LINK: Top of page
________________________________

– Addison’s Disease

As members would know, medicos now agree that Jane Austen died from Addison’s Disease – a complaint neither recognised nor named until some 40 years after her death. After contact here with a person suffering from this complaint, the Society decided to make a small donation to the Support Group for other sufferers, and to share some of the information the Group supplied.

Addison’s disease is a severe or total deficiency of the hormones made in the external adrenal gland. There are normally two adrenal glands, the inner part of which produces adrenaline at times of stress, helping the body by raising the pulse rate, adjusting blood flow, and raising blood sugar. However, the absence of this gland does not cause disease.

It is the outer portion of the adrenal, the cortex, which is more critical. The adrenal cortex makes two important steroid hormones, which mobilise nutrients, stimulate the liver to raise the blood sugar, and help to control the amount of water in the body. Classical Addison’s disease results from a loss of such hormones due to the destruction of both adrenal glands. Symptoms include physical fatigue, weakness, craving for salt, low blood pressure, pigmentation, weight loss, postural dizziness, and there may be black freckles over the head and shoulder areas. Later developments are nausea, dehydration from vomiting and diarrhoea, dizziness, cold intolerance, apathy, mental confusion, fever, and abdominal pain. Some of these symptoms are evident in letters and diary entries by and of Jane Austen.

When Dr Thomas Addison first described this disease in London in 1855, the most common cause was tuberculosis. By the middle of the 20th century antibiotics progressively reduced TB’s incidence. Since then, the major cause of Addison’s disease has been an auto-immune reaction. It is still, fortunately, a rare disease, and one with which even the medical profession is still all too unfamiliar.

All information derived from:
Living with Addison’s Disease,
Paul Margulies, MD, from NADF News, Vol IX, No. 2, 1996.
Addison Patients in the Netherlands: Medical Report of the Survey, Zelissen, P M J.
Addison’s Disease, from Physician’s Guide to Rare Diseases, 2nd Edn, Jess G Thorne MD 1995


A self help group for people with this illness offers information, newsletters and contact with fellow members.

Australian Addison’s Support Group

PO Box 2436, Coffs Harbour NSW 2450 Ph 02 6652 4761 or 6653 6340.


LINK: Top of page
________________________________

– George Austen’s Grave

The Bath press (The Bath Chronicle, 9 October 2000, p12) reported the success of the project, assisted by JASA, to renovate Jane’s father’s grave, so that it would be more visible.

More than 100 people travelled from across the world for a ceremony marking the renovation of the tombstone of Jane Austen’s father in Bath on Saturday.

Members of the Jane Austen societies came from as far afield as Australia, America and Japan to attend the event in the garden of St Swithin’s Church, Walcot.

The tombstone of the Rev George Austen was moved from the corner of the garden to the side, allowing it to be seen. The stone is also now accompanied by a plaque outlining the Austen family’s links with Bath and the church, and the work cost the society £2,000. Michael Davis, from the Society, said: ‘It has taken a lot of hard work raising the money for the plaque and the re-siting of the stone.

‘We are particularly grateful to the Jane Austen societies of Britain, Australia and North America for their generous donations.’

The stone was originally moved in 1968 from the church’s crypt floor to the corner of its garden after the Society’s members discovered it was becoming worn out as church visitors tramped across it.

Since then, Society members have planned to move it to a more prominent position where members of the public can view it without having to enter the church or its garden.

Richard Knight, a direct descendant of the author, was one of 12 descendants who attended the ceremony. He said: ‘It is wonderful that people have travelled so far to pay tribute to the Austen family. The plaque is most appropriate.’

Rev Austen married Jane’s mother, Cassandra Leigh, at the church in 1764. He died in 1804 and was buried in the church’s crypt. After her father’s death, Jane stayed in Bath before going to Hampshire where she wrote her three last books.

The city’s links with Jane Austen have now spawned a special centre in Gay Street and a thriving tourist trade.

[Australia had another connection in the Bath press that day, reporting an annual ceremony celebrating the life and achievements of our Governor Arthur Phillip.]

LINK: Top of page
________________________________ 

 

chawtpen.gif (3825 bytes)

 

 

Dear Friends

The year 2000 has not been without excitement, but life here has slowly settled down into the usual fairly quiet routine after all the celebrations last year for our 50th anniversary. We have continued our programme of conservation of the exhibits, on-going work begun about fifteen years ago, with the aid of a grant from Hampshire County Council. We began with all the paper exhibits - drawings, water-colours and copies of letters, for example, and had them cleaned, re-mounted on acid-free board and re-framed. However tightly sealed pictures are, tiny insects (thunder bugs) get in during hot humid weather, and now we have special frames that can be opened up for cleaning. Nowadays special fixtures are available to make pictures thief-proof - isn’t it sad that this is necessary?

Our conservation project this year has been the restoration of the square piano which has been in the museum for nearly fifty years. Although not Jane’s own piano, it is of the right period, a Clementi made in 1810. It has always looked rather sad, with wobbly legs, the pedal missing and, I have to confess, water marks on the top where we used to put vases of flowers! The piano was away for a few months while Peter Casebow, a specialist cabinet maker, restored the legs and the pedal and gently cleaned and polished the case. The hammers and strings were repaired and the ivory keys cleaned by Andrew Lancaster. The piano arrived back, looking sleek and well-cared-for, but still antique, just in time to be played in public on the day of the Jane Austen Society’s AGM in July. Andrew told us that it is the sweetest-toned Clementi he has ever heard, and it is really nice to have it available now for musical events, and not to have to borrow the village hall piano! Just recently a recording was made of some of the pieces in Jane Austen’s music books for a Compact Disc, played on our Clementi, so that soon everyone will be able to hear its lovely tone.

The Jane Austen Memorial Trust has just been given a fine silver teapot with the Austen family crest on it. It is believed to have belonged to Jane’s sister Cassandra, and used by her on special occasions at Chawton. A water-colour portrait, possibly of Cassandra, has been lent to the Trust for a while. The head and shoulders are very well-drawn and painted, but it is obvious that another less talented hand has finished off, or even added, the dress. So far it has been impossible to prove that the sitter is in fact Cassandra, as there is a gap in the provenance, but who knows? One day someone may find the missing link. [Pictures of both the teapot and the possible Cassandra portrait appeared in our September Practicalities. Ed.]

The Memorial Trust has also been lent a wax impression of Mary, Queen of Scots. This seal was given to the wife of Jane Austen’s second cousin, Mrs J. Austen, by Earl Stanhope, and it is good to have this on display for a while, as Jane admired Mary so much - I’m sure you have all read Jane’s account of her in The History of England, by a partial, prejudiced and ignorant Historian! If not, you really should, as it is a good laugh, as the youngsters say these days.

We have also recently been lent a set of six late 18th century silver dessert spoons, with a very distinctive berry-fruit decoration and engraved with the Knight family crest. We understand that these spoons belonged to Jane’s brother Edward Knight, and that they were probably in use at Godmersham Park when Jane and Cassandra stayed there.

Initial recording of all the objects in the museum on to the MODES database commenced in July this year, and will be an on-going project, done by a student in holiday times. Austen scholar, Deirdre LeFaye, has searched all the Jane Austen Society’s Annual Reports for information on objects which have been given or lent either to the Society or to the Jane Austen Memorial Trust (which owns and administers the museum) and now it is hoped to study all past correspondence, so that we can add notes on provenance to the MODES database.

Two new Trustees have recently been appointed to the Jane Austen Memorial Trust. They both bring valuable skills to the administration of Jane Austen’s House. Maggie Lane [key speaker at the July JASA conference in Leura], whom many of you know, and whose books I am sure you have read, will provide a link with the Committee of the Jane Austen Society, and has experience in education and research. Ann Pembroke is an active Society member who has much experience in the equivalent museums at the Dickens Trust, the Keats House and Dr Johnson’s House.

A project of much concern to the Trustees, and to all those who work at Jane Austen’s House, has just arisen. A proposal has been made for a development of three large terraced houses to be built on the Grey Friar car park right opposite the House. If permitted, these buildings would completely change the whole aspect of Chawton village. The view from our windows has remained largely unaltered since Jane lived here, except for the 1960s extension to ‘Cassandra’s Cup’, the cafe opposite, which is in keeping and not too worrying when one is gasping for a cup of tea! Our opinion, and that of a large number of the villagers, is that that there should be no building development on that site. In the event of a formal application being submitted to East Hampshire District Council, we hope that members of all the Jane Austen societies, who feel that these houses would completely spoil the village, will write in with their objections to this plan. Please do give us your support!

With best wishes to you all,

 

Jean Bowden

Former curator and present archivist of the Jane Austen House Museum. [See Chawton Under Threat. Write to the JASA committee or direct to the Hampshire Council ASAP to voice your concerns.]

LINK: Top of page
________________________________

 

goddards.gif (1952 bytes)

Mrs. Goddard's School

Jane Austen For Juniors

The group is looking forward to an outing on the Bounty early in 2001, with an emphasis on the novel Persuasion and what it would be like to live and work on Navy ships such as the Bounty at the time of Jane Austen. Other plans for 2001 are in train, and will be advised shortly.

LINK: Top of page
________________________________

 

Other Places, Other Societies

For contact details of other Jane Austen societies and links to other Jane Austen web sites see LINKS.

Many of the items in this segment have been organised (and/or written) by member Dianne Speakmann, who has recently been persuaded to act as Liaison Officer for external groups from whom we like to hear news. Much agonising followed over the tremendously important decision of the title for this position. Dianne, tongue firmly in cheek, has suggested the delightful Foreign Correspondent, which will probably stick.

LINK: Top of page
________________________________

Jane Austen in Holland

Het is een alom erkende waarheid dat een vrijgezelle man van stand een echtgenote behoeft.

That’s the Dutch version of It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife. You recognised it at once, didn’t you!!

It has come to us by courtesy of our first member in Holland, who has also been persuaded to answer some questions on the Jane Austen presence in her country. The questions (posed by our president) and the member’s answers are fascinating.

How old were you when you first read a JA novel and which one was it?

I must have been 16, and it was Pride and Prejudice. In order to get my exams I was supposed to read 25 books of English literature. Five of them had to be either 17th, 18th or 19th century. My choice wasn’t an obvious one as Pride and Prejudice has a lot of pages and that was not the main objective in school. Nevertheless I was fascinated that I was actually able to read a book in another language and much impressed by what I recall as parody.

Did you read it in Dutch or in English?

I read it in English, but had a Dutch translation nearby. It was a kind of dual reading.

How easy is it to get JA’s novels in Holland, in the original English and in Dutch translation?

It is very easy to get JA novels in Holland. Any reliable bookstore will have copies in both languages, both in paperback and those lovely hard copies. Pretty expensive though, published by Everyman.

Do school students studying English ever get given a JA novel to read?

I’ve never been to university studying English, but I think it’s very likely that Jane is being studied.

Have all the film and TV versions of her novels been screened in Holland? Were they dubbed into Dutch and were they popular?

About two years ago there was a Jane hype, due to both the film and BBC TV version of Pride and Prejudice being screened. In Holland the films aren’t dubbed, but subtitled. The TV version of Pride and Prejudice was very popular, as was the film of Sense and Sensibility, primarily popular because of Hugh Grant.

Do you have any Dutch friends who also read and enjoy JA?

I’m sorry to say that my friends are aware of my enthusiasm for Jane but can’t understand it. They consider hers to be just romantic stories. Mind you most of them have read Pride and Prejudice because they were supposed to in school, but definitely not in English. The subtlety of her observations does tend to get lost in translation. It’s my guess that the Brontë sisters are more popular.

Which famous English novelists are popular with Dutch readers?

You must bear in mind that Dutch literature is strongly influenced by both Flemish and American writers. Most Dutch don’t really differentiate between American and English literature as it is English to them and translations will be read. I think that probably Thomas Hardy, D H Lawrence and certainly E M Forster are well liked.

What is it you especially enjoy about JA’s novels?

What appeals to me most are the keen observations Jane makes of her world. She has an awareness and detachment whilst at the same time being part of her world. As a woman I find the way she distinguishes gender and the way that materialises in her world fascinating – even more so because she complies with this world, and feels no need to change it, but wonders why things are the way they are. That is a kind of acceptance I would like to find. When I visited her house [at Chawton] I was thrilled to find that they left the door creaking, so whenever Jane would be

writing it would give her time to put away her notes. She is also able to maintain her dignity and not give away her outlook on life. Fin